|
egdqv13234 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
@fakenphoney nop its a thompson sub machinegun a1 i think
89Obscure (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
OMG, he's Strelok!
loribit85 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Does 'Roadside Picknick' shed any light whatsoever on the meaning of this movie?
ToggleJabaut (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
definitely a thompson, you can see the handle, if it was a mouser it would just have the barrel.
almanacofsleep (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
@Gotteskrieger07 The is no symbolism in this film, there is no true interpration of this film, only opinions imformed by personal experience of the veiwer.
nitroglobus (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
@Szczotkov I agree with you. The pure beauty of this sequence may come from its very slow rhythm that allow us to think, at last.
hobofactory (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
@fakenphoney Definitely a Thompson Model 1928 sub-machine gun.
ksushka (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
@seekthedragonoutEduard Nikolaevich Artemyev - composer for 3 of Tarkovsky movies.
shalashaskalives (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
@Gotteskrieger07 its been widely documented that the religious references depict a preoccupation only. tarkovsky has always said that the symbolism is flat, the objects are to be understood as objects, things of materiality and texture which hold age. he has described any direct metaphorical abstraction as crude. for me the film documents the complexity of the human condition rather than the pursuit of the afterlife. the greatness of a film like this is of course the broad interpretation
TheSirSandro (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
@Lucidius134 It is a Thompson. |
